Why your AI is really Thanos
Will you be able to join the Avengers?
Over the last five years, I have read more than 600 books. That works out to well over 100 books a year.
For a long time, I wore that number as a badge of honor. It sounded impressive. It felt productive. It gave me a sense of identity.
Then something strange happened.
I realized I was no longer reading for the joy of reading.
I was reading for the number.
The target had quietly shifted.
The books were no longer the point. The scorecard was.
And that realization led me to an uncomfortable conclusion:
You probably should not read 100 books a year.
Not because reading is bad. Not because learning is overrated. But because metrics have a nasty habit of hijacking meaning.
When the Number Becomes the Goal
At first, a target can be useful.
Read more.
Exercise more.
Write more.
Learn more.
But somewhere along the way, the target stops being a guide and becomes an identity.
You are no longer someone who enjoys reading.
You are “a person who reads 100 books a year.”
That sounds harmless until you notice what comes next.
You only watch movies with IMDb ratings above 7.0.
You only appreciate the “right” artists.
Your walls display Salvador Dalí’s melting clocks because they signal sophistication.
You would never be caught dead reading a Chetan Bhagat novel. God forbid one of his books accidentally appears on your Goodreads profile.
You dismiss masala Bollywood films without watching them.
You appreciate the paintings you’re supposed to appreciate.
You consume culture not for pleasure but for status.
At that point, you are no longer living.
You are curating.
Your self-image becomes a prison.
The Tyranny of Being the Person You Think You Are
The problem with a self-image is that once you create it, you spend enormous energy defending it.
As my reading numbers climbed, so did the pressure.
I was not asking whether a book deserved my attention.
I was asking whether it counted toward the total.
I was not finishing tasks because they were important.
I was finishing them because that was who I believed I was.
I was the person who cleared every email.
The person who completed every meeting note.
The person who tied up every loose end before sleeping.
Nobody demanded it.
Nobody was monitoring me.
Yet I routinely found myself awake at two or three in the morning, cleaning up the day’s work simply because my self-image required it.
The irony is that the universe did not care.
Vienna did not wait for me.
The roses bloomed and wilted without asking whether I had time to smell them.
Life continued while I was busy maintaining an identity.
And I suspect many of us are doing exactly the same thing.
Pavlov’s Smartphone
Today we live inside a giant behavioral experiment.
A notification appears.
We respond.
An email arrives.
We respond.
A message pings.
We respond.
Like Pavlov’s dogs, we have been trained to react.
The modern economy runs on our inability to sit still.
Every app wants our attention.
Every platform wants engagement.
Every news cycle wants outrage.
Every metric wants improvement.
We spend our lives chasing targets we never consciously chose.
Which brings me to AI.
And Thanos.
Why AI Is Really Thanos
Most discussions about artificial intelligence revolve around a familiar fear.
The machines will become smarter than us.
They will take over.
The Terminator will arrive.
Humanity will fight a war against robots.
I don’t think that is the most likely future.
I think AI is something far more dangerous.
AI is Thanos.
Not because it wants to destroy half of humanity.
But because it may destroy half of what keeps us occupied.
For centuries, human beings have structured their lives around work, effort, and achievement.
AI is steadily removing those requirements.
Tasks disappear.
Processes become automated.
Creative work becomes easier.
Administrative work becomes trivial.
Knowledge becomes instantly available.
The result may not be oppression.
It may be idleness.
And idleness is not necessarily a blessing.
The Unbearable Silence of Being
Imagine a world where many of your current pursuits no longer require your participation.
The chase slows down.
The targets disappear.
The deadlines become less important.
The notifications lose relevance.
What happens then?
Are we prepared to face the silence?
Can we simply exist?
Can we sit in a room without reaching for stimulation?
Can we be content without constantly becoming?
Or do we descend into conflict because we no longer know what to do with ourselves?
I sometimes wonder whether the greatest challenge of the AI age will not be economic.
It will be psychological.
Human beings are remarkably good at solving problems.
We are far less skilled at living without them.
In Indian mythology, after Lord Krishna departed, the Yadavas did not fall to some external enemy.
They destroyed themselves.
The threat came from within.
That possibility feels strangely relevant today.
AI may not conquer humanity.
It may simply remove enough friction from life that we are forced to confront ourselves.
And many of us may not like what we find.
Building the Avengers
If AI is Thanos, then what are the Infinity Stones we need to protect?
I suspect they are surprisingly ordinary.
Reading for pleasure rather than achievement.
Sports.
Friendships.
Conversation.
Community.
Walking.
Music.
Creating things that nobody pays for.
Learning things that nobody measures.
Developing an identity beyond work.
An identity beyond achievement.
An identity beyond productivity.
The challenge is not technological.
It is human.
Can we cultivate habits that make life meaningful when efficiency ceases to be scarce?
Can we slow down enough to rediscover things that were never optimized in the first place?
The Wealth Metric Nobody Talks About
Over time, I have come to a different definition of wealth.
It has nothing to do with money.
Nothing to do with title.
Nothing to do with designation.
It is measured by a single question:
How many hours a day can you safely switch off your phone?
Not silent mode.
Not airplane mode.
Not turning off notifications.
Actually switching it off.
Completely.
My personal aspiration is simple.
Work for eight hours.
Switch off for sixteen.
People who truly need me will still find me.
My family knows how to reach me.
Emergencies have always found a way.
Everything else can wait.
Because the ultimate luxury in the AI age may not be intelligence.
It may be disconnection.
Take It Slow
There is another lesson hidden in our mythology.
Lord Krishna did not react instantly to every provocation. Shishupal was forgiven again and again before the final line was crossed.
Patience mattered.
Deliberation mattered.
Restraint mattered.
Yet modern life trains us in the opposite direction.
Immediate replies.
Instant reactions.
Continuous engagement.
Permanent availability.
The future may belong to those who relearn the ability to pause.
To think.
To wait.
To be.
Thanos Is Already Here
The future is not coming.
It has arrived.
Thanos is not a purple alien descending from the sky.
Thanos is sitting quietly on your desk.
It is ChatGPT.
It is Gemini.
It is Claude.
It is every system that makes human effort cheaper, faster, and less necessary.
The question is not whether AI will change the world.
It already has.
The question is whether we can build lives that remain meaningful when work is no longer enough to define us.
Thanos is here.
Whether you become an Avenger is up to you.


Hit a little too close to home.
I'm also one of the "100 books a year" people. And at some point I noticed the counter had quietly swapped places with the reading. I wasn't finishing books anymore. I was feeding a number. The books were just the fuel.
(I very rarely watch movies, so the Thanos half went over my head. The rest landed clean.)
What broke it was almost insultingly simple. I stopped counting. Just read, and reread, for the fun of it. Some years I fall short of 100 now, and enjoy it far more. The scorecard was never measuring the reading. It was standing in front of it.
Your wealth metric resonated, and it pairs with one I keep coming back to: wealth is the ability to say "No." Not the polite no. The legitimate one. You decline and feel zero pressure to have said yes. Pretty close to your metric, isn't it?